By arnold stovel 

How Badly Does Media Want a Trump Presidency?

In the contemporary media landscape, accusations of bias and favoritism are as common as they are controversial. Yet, the specific charge that the media shows a preference for Donald Trump and conservatives despite a slew of convictions, scandals, and ethical controversies raises profound concerns about the impartiality and integrity of journalistic standards today. This issue becomes increasingly critical as Vice President Kamala Harris gears up for a possible nomination, drawing unfair criticisms that seem to mirror those once levied against Trump—criticisms that are now conspicuously muted when it comes to the former president. 

Trump’s tenure and subsequent activities have been marked by numerous legal and ethical scandals, including serious allegations of collusion and an unprecedented number of judicial appointments that have shifted the ideological balance of the courts. Despite this, a significant portion of the media continues to provide him with a platform that not only reaches millions but often skirts around these critical issues. This coverage tends to downplay or outright dismiss the gravity of his legal troubles and their implications for democracy. 

The treatment of Trump stands in stark contrast to the media's approach to Vice President Kamala Harris, who has been under a microscopic and often hypercritical lens since her appointment. The same outlets that offer a softened view of Trump’s legal entanglements are paradoxically keen to magnify any misstep by Harris, suggesting a double standard rooted in more than mere political partisanship. This discrepancy is particularly glaring given that many of the accusations hurled at Harris—for alleged incompetence or lack of transparency—are issues that were manifestly more severe during Trump’s vice presidency.Moreover, the arguments currently used against Biden, casting doubts on his effectiveness or integrity, seem to be a projection of the very real controversies that surrounded Trump.

Yet, these criticisms are repackaged and presented with renewed vigor against Biden, without the accompanying evidence that dogged Trump’s administration. The media, in many cases, plays a pivotal role in this reframing, applying a level of scrutiny to Biden and Harris that was conspicuously absent in Trump’s case despite ample justification.

This pattern of favoritism is not only misleading but also dangerous. It distorts public perception, allowing Trump and similar figures to escape accountability while simultaneously setting an unreasonably high bar for their opponents. This imbalance does a disservice to the public, which relies on the media for fair and balanced reporting to make informed decisions.


The implications of this biased media landscape extend beyond individual political figures like Trump or Harris. They touch on the very core of democratic integrity, influencing how justice is perceived and administered in America. When media outlets fail to hold all leaders to the same standard, they contribute to a polarized environment where truth becomes a matter of allegiance rather than fact.

 
As the political arena heats up with Vice President Harris possibly at the helm of a future ticket, the need for the media to introspect and recalibrate its approach to coverage is urgent. The media must strive to dismantle this apparent favoritism and commit to a journalism that is truly impartial, ensuring that all political figures, regardless of their party affiliation, are subject to the same rigorous standards of transparency and accountability. This is not just essential for the health of American democracy; it is fundamental to the principles of justice and fairness that should guide any society claiming to be free and fair. 

"Mindful citizens recognize that history repeats itself. We have seen what happens when the world pretends racist, ethnic cleansing is not their concern. It is sad that those lessons are lost on the people who once so fiercely proclaimed their suffering above all others."


- Arnold Stovell  

We use cookies
Cookie preferences
Below you may find information about the purposes for which we and our partners use cookies and process data. You can exercise your preferences for processing, and/or see details on our partners' websites.
Analytical cookies Disable all
Functional cookies
Other cookies
We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. Learn more about our cookie policy.
Accept all Decline all Change preferences
Cookies